Helena Police warn drivers of consequences for driving under the influence of marijuana
]
HELENA — With the start of adult-use marijuana sales on January 1 in Montana, it has never been more accessible to residents and visitors of Big Sky Country.
Along with the increased availability, comes increased concerns over people driving while under the influence of cannabis.
“The State of Montana, a DUI is a DUI, whether you are impaired by alcohol or marijuana or any other drug for that matter,” said Lieutenant Jayson Zander of the Helena Police Department.
If you are pulled over, and the police officer feels that you are driving under the influence of marijuana or any other substance, an officer specializing in drug recognition will come to the scene.
Additionally, Zander says, “Each drug belongs to one of the seven drug categories, and there are specific signs and symptoms associated this each drug, and these officers will specialize training can determine. One whether you are impaired and two what drug category you are impaired by.”
When a motorist is issued a driver’s license at the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), a section is signed agreeing to comply with a sobriety test.
“The comply consent advisory, and what that means is that when you sign for your driver’s license, it is implied that you will consent to test for drugs or alcohol in your system,” Zander said.
Driving while being high will be treated just like driving under the influence of alcohol, and just like alcohol, there is a legal limit.
“If you have five nanograms of THC in the blood, it is much like the same as having .08 alcohol content; it falls under the same code the same law,” explained Zander
In the state, the first offense of driving under the influence will result in jail time from 24 hours to six months. And a fine of $600 to $1,000.
A fourth offense for driving under the influence could result in a felony charge which would include prison time, serving 13 months to 5-years, and a fine of $5,000 to $10,000.
District court roundup: Man gets prison time for sexual abuse of minor, fifth DUI
]
Country
United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People’s Socialist Republic of Algeria, People’s Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People’s Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People’s Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People’s Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People’s Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People’s Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D’Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People’s Rep’c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People’s Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People’s Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People’s Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People’s Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe
Ask Amy: Concerned dad disgusted with daughter’s DUI boyfriend who got license back then got pulled over again
]
Dear Amy: I’m concerned about my 24-year-old daughter’s choice in a boyfriend. She is an intelligent college graduate, working in her field.
She met her boyfriend at work, and they quickly became serious. He is an unskilled laborer in the company’s warehouse, working there since high school.
He moved into her apartment. He works just enough to pay his bills and go hunting and fishing. He has no long-term plans.
When she met him, he was dealing with a DUI, having lost his license with a blood alcohol level of .15 and a subsequent accident.
She helped sort out all the court documents and necessary steps to finally get his license back, which was just finalized a few weeks before Christmas.
Then, on Christmas Eve, he left our house in her car to go to a dispensary and was pulled over for erratic speed. He was charged with another DUI.
I told him privately how disgusted I am with his behavior (he’s 27).
I thanked our daughter for all she did for Christmas, but also told her that she had some thinking to do.
I said that he clearly hadn’t learned from his first DUI, but she didn’t want to discuss it.
We are disappointed and frightened for her.
Should I pursue any further conversation with her? I don’t know if it will be productive.
Should I let her figure this out on her own?
Would a written letter be effective?
– Concerned Pop
Dear Concerned: Your daughter’s boyfriend was nabbed for DUI while driving to a dispensary on Christmas Eve. This means that he was either drunk or high when he was pulled over, and that he was headed out to purchase more.
It is illegal in every state to drive under the influence of marijuana.
He obviously has a problem.
Yes, your bright and successful daughter has some thinking to do.
I don’t think you should push too hard, because pressure and judgment might push her toward him.
Some people need to personally experience the real-world consequences of addiction before they can take action.
Your daughter protected her boyfriend from some of the trouble associated with his previous DUI.
Any attempt by you to control her might actually insulate her from the actual consequences of living with such a needy and troublesome partner.
Convey that you care about her and are always in her corner. A “friends and family” support group like Al-anon could introduce her to others who are also powerless over another’s addiction. That might be a persuasive influence.
Dear Amy: My husband’s family gathered for their annual holiday party. After 35 years of marriage, I acknowledge that these parties are stressful events for me.
I develop physical ailments approaching the dates of these gatherings and am unable to sleep.
There is excessive drinking and bigoted talk.
My husband’s stance on this behavior is to ignore it.
I chose not to attend this year.
Apparently, my husband made up a story about my having to get together with an out-of-town friend.
Now, my sister-in-law is asking how my visit was with my friend.
I prefer not to lie. I also do not intend to attend these events in the future.
How do I handle the inquisition from my sister-in-law?
How do I encourage my husband to stop making up excuses?
– Done with the Toxicity
Dear Done: Your husband can explain your absence. You don’t have to affirm it, however.
Your sister-in-law might be hunting for an explanation because she senses that your husband was not being truthful.
You can respond: “I always find this party pretty stressful, so I decided to skip it. ‘Barney’ enjoys it, so we decided to go our separate ways this year. I hope you all had a good time – and that you have a great new year.”
Dear Amy: My son and his wife have five children!
They don’t go out often, but to put a 20 percent tip on top of the cost of meals would make going out to eat impossible.
The children would never know the joy of experiencing new places or new people.
If you can tip 20 percent, by all means do.
But I do not believe all waitresses are as cold-hearted as you seem to be.
– Upset
Dear Upset: The reason I was a waitress was because my family (of six) lacked the funds to go out. We all worked our way through high school and college.
My point is that skipping restaurant dining isn’t exactly deprivation.
(You can email Amy Dickinson at askamy@amydickinson.com or send a letter to Ask Amy, P.O. Box 194, Freeville, NY 13068. You can also follow her on Twitter @askingamy or Facebook.)
©2021 Amy Dickinson. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Nationals pitcher Seth Romero arrested on DWI charge
]
Today’s Headlines
The most important news stories of the day, curated by Post editors and delivered every morning.
Email address
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Chicago man sentenced to 20 years for fatal 2019 DUI crash in Clarendon Hills
]
“This case is the definition of a tragedy,” Berlin said in a statement. “The senseless loss of two innocent lives will forever be on the shoulders of Mr. Rodea-Cruz. His decision to operate a motor vehicle after he had been drinking cost Marko Boskovic and Laura Uribe their lives. To Marco’s and Laura’s surviving family and friends, I offer my sincerest condolences and wish them well as they continue their lives with just the memories of Marko and Laura to sustain them.”